Jonathan Portes's picture
Affiliation: 
KIng's College, London
Credentials: 
Professor of Econoics and Public Policy

Voting history

German current account surpluses

====================================================================

Question 2: Do you agree that the German government should increase public spending given its persistently large current account surplus and given that it is part of the Eurozone?

====================================================================

 

Answer:
Agree
Confidence level:
Extremely confident
Comment:
There is no economic or intellectual case for asymmetric adjustment. Countries with (current account and fiscal) surpluses need to adjust too. It's true fiscal policy alone may hae limited impact but it won't have zero impact and will still help. Moreover the refugee influx, in particular, is a cast-iron case for spending more on "investment" now (especially in language training and labour market integration) given the potentially huge longterm economic and social benefits (and the costs of failing to do so)

====================================================================

Question 1: Do you agree that German current account surpluses are a threat to the Eurozone economy?

====================================================================

Answer:
Strongly agree
Confidence level:
Extremely confident
Comment:
No one is arguing that Germany does not produce high quality goods which the rest of the world wants to buy. And there are demographic reasons why some surplus makes sense. But the current level of the surplus imies capital outflows which are simply too high; at some point they will be reversed and the adjustment may well be painful. This is not just an intra-euro zone issue

Are academic economists ‘in touch’ with voters and politicians?

====================================================================

Question 7: Voters did not know that there was near-unanimity among economists.

Do you agree that this was an important reason for a majority of UK voters going against the near unanimous advice of the economics profession?

====================================================================

Answer:
Disagree
Confidence level:
Very confident

====================================================================

Question 6: Economists did not explain the reasons for this consensus in sufficiently clear language.

Do you agree this was an important reason for a majority of UK voters going against the near unanimous advice of the economics profession?

====================================================================

Answer:
Strongly Disagree
Confidence level:
Very confident

====================================================================

Question 5: Voters think that the preferences of economists do not align with their own preferences. (This includes the possibility that they thought that the predicted negative economic consequences would not affect them personally).

Do you agree this was an important reason for a majority of UK voters going against the near unanimous advice of the economics profession?

====================================================================

Answer:
Agree
Confidence level:
Not confident

Pages