Richard Portes's picture
Affiliation: 
London Business School and CEPR

Voting history

German Council of Economic Experts' view of ECB policy

====================================================================

Question 2: Do you agree that the ECB's monetary policy masks structural problems of member states?

====================================================================

Answer:
Strongly disagree
Confidence level:
Extremely confident
Comment:
'Masks structural problems' by promoting economic expansion and price stability? Give me a break. They neither propose nor show any causal link. The only story is the 'moral hazard' argument - that governments feel less pressure to reform if they feel less pressure from the bond markets. Where is the evidence? The slowdown in reforms supposedly documented by the OECD is not based on any quantitative evidence. Even if one accepted it, one could argue that previous reforms had exploited 'low-hanging fruit', so it would be normal that the observed effort would slow down. Moreover, it is a common political economy argument (with some empirical support) that reforms are easier in the context of a reasonable pace of growth - otherwise there are too many losers. Did Mr Schaeuble write this report?

====================================================================

Question 1: Do you agree that exceptionally loose monetary policy by the European Central Bank is no longer appropriate?

====================================================================

Answer:
Strongly disagree
Confidence level:
Extremely confident
Comment:
The ECB has a single mandate, specified in the Treaty: price stability. The ECB itself has defined what that means: inflation close to but not exceeding 2 percent. It has manifestly failed to fulfill its mandate, and consequently by mid-2014 inflation expectations had become 'de-anchored'. QE stopped the slide, but the latest survey of professional forecasters (2016 Q3) shows 5-year ahead inflation expectations still at the level of 2015Q1. Unless the German Council of Economic Experts could argue that exiting from QE would raise inflation and inflation expectations, or propose alternative policies to fulfil the mandate, they should desist from ECB-bashing and let the ECB get on with trying to do its job.

Are academic economists ‘in touch’ with voters and politicians?

====================================================================

Question 7: Voters did not know that there was near-unanimity among economists.

Do you agree that this was an important reason for a majority of UK voters going against the near unanimous advice of the economics profession?

====================================================================

Answer:
Strongly agree
Confidence level:
Extremely confident

====================================================================

Question 6: Economists did not explain the reasons for this consensus in sufficiently clear language.

Do you agree this was an important reason for a majority of UK voters going against the near unanimous advice of the economics profession?

====================================================================

Answer:
Strongly Disagree
Confidence level:
Confident

====================================================================

Question 5: Voters think that the preferences of economists do not align with their own preferences. (This includes the possibility that they thought that the predicted negative economic consequences would not affect them personally).

Do you agree this was an important reason for a majority of UK voters going against the near unanimous advice of the economics profession?

====================================================================

Answer:
Agree
Confidence level:
Confident

Pages