Question 3: Using not only the policy tools that have been part of the UK policy mix thus far but also policy tools implemented in other countries, to what extent does the government face a tradeoff between saving lives and preserving livelihoods?
Answer:
Large tradeoff
Confidence level:
Not confident
Comment:
There is no single answer to this question. There are some policies that can save lives with nearly no economic impact: for example wearing masks, encouraging moderate social distancing, personal hygiene. But Covid-19 spread eventually even where these "low hanging fruit" were broadly followed. This means that to further mitigate Covid's spread, additional measures need to be taken and these appear to be rather costly at least in certain sectors (closing theaters, enforcing 2-meter distancing in restaurants, closing pubs, ect.).
Question 2: How much will the new lockdown measures introduced on Thursday November 5 hurt UK economic activity this year relative to a counterfactual with the milder measures adopted over the summer?
Answer:
Small damage
Confidence level:
Confident
Comment:
I would assess the damages to be small to moderate. Consumption data over the summer both in the UK and in other countries indicate that individuals (particularly young adults) had returned to nearly normal levels of consumption. In other words, there is far less voluntary social distancing than there was at the beginning of the pandemic. This implies a sharper trade-off between the public health and economic objectives than there previously was.
Question 1: How much of the decline in GDP experienced to date would have been avoided in the absence of any lockdown measures or other policy interventions (such as fiscal support)?
Answer:
A small portion of the decline
Confidence level:
Not confident at all
Comment:
Much of the decline in economic activity would have occurred regardless, because of individual's reluctance to consume in sectors where infection and transmission risks were high. Many employers would have imposed voluntary work-from-home regimes. Moreover, the fiscal support will have mitigated some of the economic harm. However, I am sceptical of claims that there was no trade off whatsoever between the health and economic objectives.
Question 3: Which of the following best reflects your opinion on the following statement? “The ECB should explicitly recognize unemployment and/or economic growth as a secondary aim, secondary to its price stability mandate.”
Answer:
Agree
Confidence level:
Confident
Question 2: Would you support increasing the ECB’s inflation target to a higher rate of inflation than the current 2% target?
The CFM surveys informs the public about the views held by prominent economists based in Europe on important macroeconomic and public policy questions. Some surveys focus specifically on the UK economy (as the CFM is a UK research centre), but surveys can in principle focus on any macroeconomic question for any region. The surveys shed light on the extent to which there is agreement or disagreement among these experts. An important motivation for the survey is to give a more comprehensive overview of the beliefs held by economists and in particular to include the views of those economists whose opinions are not frequently heard in public debates.
Questions mainly focus on macroeconomic and public policy topics. Although there are some questions that focus specifically on the UK economy, the setup of the survey is much broader and considers questions related to other countries/regions and also considers questions not tied to a specific economy.
The surveys are done in collaboration with the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
Lockdowns and UK Economic Performance
Question 3: Using not only the policy tools that have been part of the UK policy mix thus far but also policy tools implemented in other countries, to what extent does the government face a tradeoff between saving lives and preserving livelihoods?
Question 2: How much will the new lockdown measures introduced on Thursday November 5 hurt UK economic activity this year relative to a counterfactual with the milder measures adopted over the summer?
Question 1: How much of the decline in GDP experienced to date would have been avoided in the absence of any lockdown measures or other policy interventions (such as fiscal support)?
Should the ECB Reformulate its Inflation Objective?
Question 3: Which of the following best reflects your opinion on the following statement? “The ECB should explicitly recognize unemployment and/or economic growth as a secondary aim, secondary to its price stability mandate.”
Question 2: Would you support increasing the ECB’s inflation target to a higher rate of inflation than the current 2% target?
Pages