Question 1: Which of the following best reflects your opinion on the following statement? “The ECB should explicitly state that it will allow inflation to temporarily exceed the 2% target following extended periods of low inflation.”
Answer:
Disagree
Confidence level:
Confident
Comment:
To keep her credibility, the ECB needs clear and verifiable objectives. The freedom to “allow inflation to temporarily exceed the 2% target following extended periods of low inflation” seems too vague: What is the meaning of "temporary"? By how much would inflation be allowed to overshoot?
Question 1: What is the total size of funding that you would advocate at the EU level in support of its members to weather the COVID-19 crisis this year?
Answer:
5% of EZ GDP: No more than current commitments
Confidence level:
Confident
Comment:
The Covid-19 epidemic is a common shock. While death rates differ across countries, the predicted contraction in real GDP for 2020 is roughly in the same -7% to -9% range for all individual EU member countries, according to the latest IMF WEO (April 2020). The predicted contraction of German GDP (-7%) is only marginally smaller than that of Spain (-8%). (Relative to population size, the Covid mortality has so far been highest in Belgium, not in Italy or Spain!). In macro-economic terms, Covid-19 is a COMMON shock. A strong case for cross-country risk sharing via the EU institutions can be made when there are large asymmetric shock. But this logic does not apply to a common shock. The countries of the Southern periphery (including France) are now paying the price for their long-standing fiscal mismanagement.
Question 2: What is the best mechanism to pay for economic support provided by and to EU member states to combat the COVID-19 crisis?
Answer:
Member states themselves (no additional EU support)
Confidence level:
Confident
Comment:
See previous answer. Covid-19 is a common macroeconomic shock. Basically, countries and and should deal with the macroeconomic fallout of this shock, using their own fiscal resources.
However, a very strong case can be made for much more aggressive EU-level support to research on Covid tests, the development of a virus, and the rapid expansion of production of medical equipment. This is an area where there are huge increasing returns and positive externalities! The EU Commission should launch a European 'Manhattan Project' to develop tests and vaccines against Covid and other future health threats, and to build a stronger, more self-sufficient European medical equipment/pharmaceutical industry.
Question 2: Do you agree that, in a period of great uncertainty and after a prolonged period of weak real wage growth, monetary policy makers can afford to wait for greater certainty about real wage developments and building inflationary pressure before raising interest rates?
It all depends on the underlying shocks. When aggregate demand shocks are driving the cycle, then strong labor markets indicate inflationary pressure. But not when aggregate supply shocks are dominant.
The CFM surveys informs the public about the views held by prominent economists based in Europe on important macroeconomic and public policy questions. Some surveys focus specifically on the UK economy (as the CFM is a UK research centre), but surveys can in principle focus on any macroeconomic question for any region. The surveys shed light on the extent to which there is agreement or disagreement among these experts. An important motivation for the survey is to give a more comprehensive overview of the beliefs held by economists and in particular to include the views of those economists whose opinions are not frequently heard in public debates.
Questions mainly focus on macroeconomic and public policy topics. Although there are some questions that focus specifically on the UK economy, the setup of the survey is much broader and considers questions related to other countries/regions and also considers questions not tied to a specific economy.
The surveys are done in collaboration with the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
Should the ECB Reformulate its Inflation Objective?
Question 1: Which of the following best reflects your opinion on the following statement? “The ECB should explicitly state that it will allow inflation to temporarily exceed the 2% target following extended periods of low inflation.”
The Eurozone COVID-19 Crisis: EU Policy Options
Question 1: What is the total size of funding that you would advocate at the EU level in support of its members to weather the COVID-19 crisis this year?
Question 2: What is the best mechanism to pay for economic support provided by and to EU member states to combat the COVID-19 crisis?
Labour Markets and Monetary Policy
======================================================================
Question 2: Do you agree that, in a period of great uncertainty and after a prolonged period of weak real wage growth, monetary policy makers can afford to wait for greater certainty about real wage developments and building inflationary pressure before raising interest rates?
======================================================================
======================================================================
Question 1: Do you agree that a strong labour market is a good indicator of building inflationary pressure?
======================================================================
Pages